监察留置措施与刑事强制措施衔接问题初探
贾广宇, 刘玉彬
河北师范大学 法政与公共管理学院, 河北 石家庄 050024
起止页码: 66--70页
DOI:
摘要：
随着2018年《国家监察法》出台“监察留置措施”逐渐走进大众的视野。监察留置措施与刑事强制措施的有效衔接是实现惩治职务违法犯罪的重要环节。2018年新《刑事诉讼法》针对两措施衔接问题在刑期折抵、证据适用、场所设置等都作出了相关规定，但就目前试点经验来看，监察留置措施与刑事强制措施在衔接问题上还存在着诸多需要细化的空间。留置辩护权亟待有效保障，各项人权问题也亟须进一步落实与完善。
Study on the Linkage of Supervision Detention Measures and Criminal Compulsory Measures
JIA Guang-yu, LIU Yu-bin
School of Law, Politics & Public Administration, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050024, China
Abstract:
With the introduction of The State Supervision Law in 2018, the "supervision measures" gradually come into the public view. The effective connection between supervision detaining measures and criminal compulsory measures is an important link in punishing crimes by taking advantage of duty. The new Criminal Procedure Law of 2018 has made relevant provisions on the connection between the two measures in terms of sentence deduction, application of evidence, and venue setting. However, based on the current pilot experience, there is still a lot of room for refinement in the connection between supervisory detention measures and criminal compulsory measures. The right of lien defense needs to be effectively protected, and various human rights issues need to be further implemented and improved.
收稿日期: 2021-12-08
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]梁三利.留置取代"两规"措施的法治化路径[J].天津行政学院学报, 2018(1):81-86.
[2]董邦俊,张扬.监察留置措施之法治化进路研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(1):65-77.
[3]洪浩,朱良.论监察委留置权:权力属性、运行原则及程序衔接[J].甘肃政法学院学报, 2019(2):1-10.
[4]薛向楠.中国刑事拘留制度的发展轨迹与完善路径(1954-2018)[J].中国政法大学学报, 2019(3):170-182+209.
[5]何静.监察留置措施的功能定位与规范续造[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(2):123-131.
[6]陈晓林.监察留置措施与刑事强制措施的衔接问题研究[D].济南:山东大学, 2020.