以先锋之名再度行于乡野——20世纪90年代以来乡土小说中“先锋叙事”的转型
周银银
盐城师范学院 文学院, 江苏 盐城 224002
起止页码: 62--68页
DOI:
摘要：
20世纪90年代以来，乡土小说中的“先锋叙事”蔚为大观。与20世纪80年代相比，它们在叙述重心、审美风格、精神向度上发生了转型。作家不再醉心于纯粹的先锋技巧实验，也未执着于以乡土为背景来探讨人类存在本身的荒诞等抽象主题，而是将目光聚焦乡土大地，通过荒诞变形的艺术去打探中国乡村社会的历史景观与现实世相，具有“实地”精神。先锋技法在对80年代的沿袭和变革中呈现出复杂及多元化态势，经由视角、时间、空间、语言的探险，折射出作家对“先锋与传统”“荒诞与真实”的新思考，彰显着他们对宏大叙事的消解和对“不可靠”叙事的热衷。其中，东方式先锋技巧层出叠见，突显了“中国气象”和“民族气韵”。与80年代弥漫的绝望气息不同，90年代后的先锋式乡土小说于质疑中还潜藏着作家参与乡村历史建构和介入当下现实的激情，烛照出为乡村振兴出谋划策的宏愿。总之，凭借“探险”和“接地”的审美突围，他们打造了另类乡土中国形象，在文学故土上开辟了新疆域。
Walking in the Countryside Again in the Name of Pioneer——The Transformation of “Pioneer Narrative” in Local Novels since the 1990s
ZHOU Yin-yin
School of Chinese Language and Literature, Yancheng Normal University, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224002, China
Abstract:
Since the 1990s, local novels with pioneer narrative have attracted a great deal of attention. Compared with that of 1980s, the pioneer narrative has transferred in narrating focus, aesthetic style and spiritual dimensions. Writers are not obsessed with pioneering technique experiments or just discussing abstract themes such as the absurdity of human existence. They focus on the rural land, exploring the historical landscape and real world of Chinese rural society through absurd and deformed art, with the spirit of “standing on the ground”. Pioneering techniques present a complex and diversified trend in the inheritance and transformation of the 1980s. Through the exploration of perspective, time, space, and language, it reflects the writer’s new thinking on “pioneer and tradition” and “absurdity and reality”, which shows their dissolution of grand narratives and their enthusiasm for “unreliable” narratives. Among them, the pioneering techniques of the Eastern style have emerged one after another, highlighting the “Chinese meteorology” and “national spirit”. Different from the desperate atmosphere that permeated in the 1980s, the pioneer local novels in the post-1990s also contained the writer’s passion for participating in the construction of rural history and intervening in the current reality in the doubts, illuminating the ambition of making suggestions for rural revitalization. In short, with the aesthetic breakthrough of “adventure” and “grounding”, they created an alternative rural Chinese image and opened up new territory in the literary homeland.
收稿日期: 2021-07-16
基金项目: 江苏省社会科学基金项目《新世纪“介入现实主义”小说研究》（18ZWC007）
参考文献：
[1]阎连科.乌龟与兔子,压抑与超越——在法国第四届“小说国际论坛”上的讲演[A].张清华,编.中国当代作家海外演讲[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:80.
[2]东君.生活比小说更荒诞[J].浙江作家,2009(5):84-87.
[3]戴锦华.残雪:梦魇萦绕的小屋[J].南方文坛,2000(5):9-17.
[4]张清华.文学的减法——论余华[J].南方文坛,2002(4):4-8.
[5]范宁.苏童:发现被遮蔽的命运[J].长江文艺,2013(6):96-105.
[6]傅小平,苏童.别了,先锋的江湖[A].傅小平.四分之三的沉默:当代文学对话录[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2016:185.
[7]残雪,等.女巫残雪:我的书要“读十几遍”[N].潇湘晨报,2015-10-11(A07).
[8]米兰·昆德拉.小说的艺术[M].董强,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2014:24.
[9]谭嘉,李锐.作家李锐访谈[EB/OL].(2006-11-12)[2021-02-01].https://cul.sohu.com/20061112/n246329389.shtml.
[10]龙迪勇.空间叙事学[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2015:81.
[11]郭文斌.农历[M].武汉:长江文艺出版社,2016:封面.
[12]董小英.叙述学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001:138.
[13]陈晓明.无边的挑战:中国先锋文学的后现代性[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015:46.
[14]梁鸿.当代文学视野中的“村庄”困境——从阎连科、莫言、李锐小说的地理世界谈起[J].文艺争鸣,2006(5):76-81.
[15]李锐,王尧.李锐王尧对话录[M].苏州:苏州大学出版社,2003:166.
[16]阎连科.不同语言背景下的文学共通性——在新加坡文学节的演讲[A].一派胡言[M].北京:中信出版社,2012:80.
[17]刘硕良,主编.诺贝尔文学奖授奖词和获奖演说[M].桂林:漓江出版社,2013:342.
[18]陈辉,余华.余华:满怀绝望去写希望之书[N].北京晨报,2013-08-11(A24).
[19]陈思和.新世纪以来长篇小说创作的两种现实主义趋向[J].渤海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(3):5-12.
[20]王湛,庄小蕾.几年过去,《兄弟》已不再显得荒诞[N].钱江晚报,2014-02-23(A0009).
[21]鲁迅.坟·我们现在怎样做父亲[A].鲁迅全集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2005:135.
[22]卢欢.莫言:这一次,把自己当罪人来写[A].卢欢.唯有孤独才有可能思考:当代著名作家访谈录[M].南京:江苏凤凰文艺出版社,2017.
[23]阎连科,蔡莹.文体:是一种写作的超越——阎连科访谈录[J].上海文学,2009(5):73-80.
[24]胡学文,于枭.胡学文:闯入者[N].青年报,2018-01-14(A01).
[25]张学昕,阎连科.现实、存在与现实主义[J].当代作家评论,2008(2):59-71.