广播组织权的理念重构——兼评“信号说”与“节目说”
孙浩翔
华东政法大学 法律硕士教育中心, 上海 200042
起止页码: 100--104页
DOI:
摘要：
广播组织权的客体界定存在分歧，主要可归为“信号说”与“节目说”之争。“信号说”的信号指广播组织经过处理产生的载体，“节目说”的节目并非指作者的作品，而是指经过广播组织加工、处理的具有较低程度独创性的“节目播出版”。通过法律解释，《罗马公约》倾向于“节目说”，但其表述本身并不符合信号原理。近年来WIPO主持的会议中各国逐渐达成“以信号为基础”的共识，但当广播组织权的客体从节目流变为信号，其便失去了落入邻接权保护的正当性。应从理论上明确广播组织权的内涵为“节目说”，对于“信号说”指向的法益应当采用反不正当竞争法予以保护。
On Reconstruction of the Concept on the Right of Broadcasting Organization——A Comment on “Signal-based Approach” and “Program-based Approach”
SUN Hao-xiang
Juris Master Education Center, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
Abstract:
The definition of the object of broadcasting organization’s right is contentious, which can be mainly categorized as a dispute between “signal-based approach” and “program-based approach”. The “signal” refers to the carrier produced by the broadcasting organization after processing, while the “program” refers to the improved version processed by the broadcasting organization with a lower degree of originality, rather than the author’s work. Based on legal interpretation, the Rome Convention favors the “program-based approach”, but this expression does not correspond to the signal doctrine. In recent years, in meetings hosted by WIPO, countries have gradually reached a consensus on “signal-based”, but when the object of broadcasting organization rights changes from program flow to signal, it loses the legitimacy of falling into the protection of neighboring rights. It should be clarified theoretically that the connotation of the right of broadcasting organization is the “program theory”, and the legal benefits pointed to by the “signal theory” should be protected by the anti-unfair competition law.
收稿日期: 2021-04-08
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]WO/GA/33/10, WIPO General Assembly, Thirty-Third (16th Extraordinary) Session, Report[EB/OL].(2006-10-03)[2020-11-15].https://www.wipo.int/meetings/zh/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=71112.
[2]SCCR/27/2 REV, Working Document for a Treaty on the Protection of Broadcasting Organizations[EB/OL].(2014-03-25)[2020-11-18]. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_27/sccr_27_2_rev.pdf.
[3]姚岚秋.《著作权法修正案(草案二次审议稿)》第47条修改问题辨析[EB/OL].(2020-10-14)[2020-11-20].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/hmOYOCjvAw_j7-b2cUuLQQ.
[4]王迁. 对《著作权法修正案(草案)(二次审议稿)》的四点意见[J]. 知识产权, 2020(9):31-46.
[5]崔国斌. 著作权法原理与案例[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:531.
[6]钱长炎. 也论电磁波的预言及其发现过程[J]. 物理, 2003(7):484-487.
[7][美] Bernard Sklar. 数字通信——基础与应用(第二版)[M]. 徐平平,等,译. 北京:电子工业出版社, 2002:3-5.
[8]范长军. 德国著作权法[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社, 2013:112.
[9]王迁. 知识产权法教程(第六版)[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2019:189.
[10]王国柱. 邻接权客体判断标准论[J]. 法律科学, 2018(5):163-172.
[11][日] 田村善之. 日本知识产权法[M]. 周超,李雨峰,李希同,译. 北京:知识产权出版社, 2010:496.
[12]Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Directive on Rental Right, Lending Right, and on Certain Rights Related to Copyright, COM (90)586 Final[EB/OL].(1990-12-13)[2020-12-03].https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:51990PC0586&from=EN.
[13]Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Services,499 U.S.340, at 341-344(1991)[EB/OL].(1991-03-27)[2020-12-03].https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/340/.
[14]
[15]胡开忠. 网络环境下广播组织权利内容立法的反思与重构——以"修正的信号说"为基础[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2019(2):39-50.
[16]嘉兴华数诉嘉兴电信侵害广播组织权纠纷案,浙江省嘉兴市中级人民法院民事判决书(2012)浙嘉知终字第7 号[EB/OL].(2014-06-18)[2020-12-04].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=51276859762e4773bb50acac5eca728a.
[17]胡开忠,陈娜,相靖. 广播组织权保护研究[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2011:36-37.
[18]Matthew D. Asbell, Comment and Recent Development:Progress on the WIPO Broadcasting and Webcasting Treaty[J],24 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J. 349,361(2006).
[19]崔丽红,曹慧. 广播组织权客体研究[J]. 法学论坛, 2019(3):69-78.
[20]孔祥俊. 反不正当竞争法新原理·原论[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2019:16.
[21]BGH GRUR 1962,470-AKI.[EB/OL] (1962-02-27)[2020-12-10]. https://beck-online.beck.de/Dokument?vpath=bibdata%2Fzeits%2Fgrur%2F1962%2Fcont%2Fgrur.1962.470.1.htm&anchor=Y-300-Z-GRUR-B-1962-S-470-N-1.