规章以下规范性文件附带审查之标准研究述评
李幸洁
复旦大学 法学院, 上海 200438
起止页码: 76--80页
DOI:
摘要：
我国规章以下规范性文件审查制度经历了依职权有限审查阶段和依职权审查与依申请附带审查并行阶段两个阶段的规范沿革。我国学界对该制度的审查标准提出了不同的观点，但以合法性审查为原则是当前理论界和实务界达成的共识。2018年颁布实施的司法解释将规范性文件附带审查标准的不合法要件归纳为超越权限、抵触上位法规定、无依据增加义务或者减损权利、违背法定程序和其他情形。这一规定回应了学界讨论和司法实践中出现的情况。我国的司法审判实践进一步发展了这一审查标准，并提出了新的问题。
Literature Review of the Research on the Standards for Collateral Review of Normative Documents under the Regulations
LI Xing-jie
School of Law, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
Abstract:
The review system of normative documents under the regulations has gone through two stages:the limited review stage according to the authority, the parallel stages of the limited review stage according to the authority and the colateral review upon application. The academic circles in China have put forward different views on the review criteria of this system, but the principle of legality review is the consensus of the theoretical and practical circles at present. The judicial interpretation issued and implemented in 2018 classifies the illegal elements of the review standards attached to normative documents as exceeding the limits of authority, violating the provisions of the upper law, adding obligations or derogation without basis, violating legal procedures and other circumstances. This regulation responds to academic discussion and judicial practice. China's judicial practice has further developed this review standard and raised some new questions.
收稿日期: 2020-09-24
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]程琥.新《行政诉讼法》中规范性文件附带审查制度研究[J].法律适用,2015(7):88-94.
[2]余军,张文.行政规范性文件司法审查权的实效性考察[J].法学研究,2016(2):42-61.
[3]黄学贤.行政规范性文件司法审查的规则嬗变及其完善[J].苏州大学学报,2017(2):73-85.
[4]北大法宝.(2013)江宁行初字049号[EB/OL].(2013-10-08)[2020-10-13].https://www.pkulaw.com/case/?keyword=%E9%99%88%E7%88%B1%E5%8D%8E%E6%A1%88.
[5]马得华.我国行政诉讼规范性文件附带审查的模式与效力难题[J].政治与法律,2017(8):77-91.
[6]章剑生.论行政诉讼中规范性文件的合法性审查[J].福建行政学院学报,2016(3):9-16.
[7]赵雪雁.规范性文件司法审查标准的重构[J].安徽大学学报,2019(5):136-148.
[8]耿玉娟.规范性文件附带审查规则的程序设计[J].法学评论,2017(5):126-134.
[9]俞祺.规范性文件的权威性与司法审查的不同层次[J].行政法学研究,2016(6):51-68.
[10]王留一.论行政规范性文件司法审查标准体系的建构[J].政治与法律,2017(9):138-152.
[11]王春业.从全国首案看行政规范性文件附带审查制度完善[J].行政法学研究,2018(2):120-128.
[12]裁判文书网.(2016)京行终3905号[EB/OL].(2016-11-03)[2020-10-13].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=97a5cf6535d54ff89dcf84ce9d0ea871.
[13]中国法院网.最高人民法院发布9起行政诉讼附带审查规范性文件典型案例:方才女诉浙江省淳安县公安局治安管理行政处罚案[EB/OL].(2018-10-30)[2020-10-13].https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2018/10/id/3551932.shtml.
[14]中国法院网.最高人民法院发布9起行政诉讼附带审查规范性文件典型案例:郑晓琴诉浙江省温岭市人民政府土地行政批准案[EB/OL].(2018-10-30)[2020-10-13].https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2018/10/id/3551934.shtml.
[15]裁判文书网.(2016)鲁06行终443号[EB/OL].(2016-12-16)[2020-10-13].https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=6be3aadecaec47b1a09b8626f3f001cd.