检索
在线阅读 --河北开放大学学报 2019年2期《非法吸收公众存款罪“非法性”及其反思——以P2P网络借贷犯罪的司法认定为视角》
非法吸收公众存款罪“非法性”及其反思——以P2P网络借贷犯罪的司法认定为视角
孙文婷
北京师范大学 刑事法律科学研究院, 北京 100875
起止页码: 59--63页
DOI:
摘要:
以P2P网络借贷为代表的互联网金融自产生以来就不断受到涉嫌非法集资的质疑,非法吸收公众存款罪在P2P网络借贷领域的适用尤其是“非法性”的认定上也存在很多问题,具体表现在主体、行为模式等入罪构成要件和“非法性”认定例外等方面。有关主体应当结合当下的司法实践,对这些问题作出总结和反思,在坚持刑法谦抑观念的前提下合理划定犯罪圈,为P2P网络借贷提供自由的发展环境,鼓励金融创新。

The Illegality of the Crime of Illegally Absorbing Public Deposits and Its Reflection——From the Perspective of Judicial Recognition of the Crime of P2P-OnlineLoans
SUN Wen-ting
College for Criminal Law Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract:
Internet finance, represented by P2P-online-loans, has been questioned for alleged illegal fund-raising since its inception. There are also many problems in the application of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits in the field of P2P-online-loans, especially the identification of "illegality", which is manifested in the constitutive elements such as the subject and behavioral pattern, and the identification exception of "illegality". Relevant subjects should summarize and reflect on these issues in light of the current judicial practice, rationally delineate criminal circles while insisting on the modest suppression of criminal law, and provide a free environment for P2P online lending and encourage financial innovation.

收稿日期: 2019-01-29
基金项目:

参考文献:
[1]李永升.P2P网络借贷的刑法规制问题研究——以近三年的裁判文书为研究样本[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(5):38-47.
[2]刘宪权. 互联网金融平台的刑事风险及责任边界[J]. 环球法律评论, 2016(5):78-91.
[3]罗明雄.P2P网贷三大模式之纯平台模式和债权转让模式[EB/OL].http://stock.sohu.com/20140711/n402104734.shtml, 2014-07-11/2017-04-05.
[4]吴晓灵.P2P只是信息中介,拆分债权涉嫌非法集资[EB/OL].http://finance.chinanews.com/fortune/2015/05-24/7297199.shtml, 2015-05-24/2017-04-09.
[5]涂龙科.P2P网贷与金融刑法危机及其应对[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2016(1):63-68.
[6]赵星. 论废除非法吸收公众存款罪[J]. 河北学刊, 2014(5):168-172.
[7]张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2016:780.
[8]何小勇. 我国金融体制改革视域下非法集资犯罪刑事规制的演变[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(4):52-64.
[9]叶亚杰. 论刑法谦抑性的价值与整合[J]. 河北法学, 2016(12):110-115.