陈亮与辛弃疾咏物词之比较
郭帅帅
南京师范大学 文学院, 江苏 南京 210024
起止页码: 34--39页
DOI:
摘要：
陈亮与辛弃疾的咏物词喻托明确、立意高远、壮美与柔美并存，与姜派咏物词形成了鲜明的对比。但是，陈亮与辛弃疾的咏物词也表现出诸多不同：龙川咏物词题材保守、狭窄，稼轩咏物词题材开拓、广阔；龙川咏物词风格庄重，稼轩咏物词则庄谐杂出；龙川咏物词偏于冷静思索，稼轩咏物词则偏于直接感发；陈亮单纯咏物，所用典故不过是在为咏物服务，而辛弃疾则将咏物与咏史结合在一起，典故本身常常成为吟咏对象。综合来看，稼轩咏物词的水平远在龙川咏物词之上。
The Similarities and Differences between Chen Liang and Xin Qiji in the Ci Poetry on Objects
GUO Shuai-shuai
College of Literature, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China
Abstract:
Chen Liang and Xin Qiji's Ci poetry on objects are metaphorically clear, high-minded, magnificent and gentle, which form a stark contrast with the Ci of Jiang Kui style. However, Chen Liang and Xin Qiji's Ci poetry on objects also show many differences:the theme of Chen Liang's Ci poetry on objects is conservative and narrow, while that of Xin Qijis Ci poetry is open and broad; the style of Chen Liang's Ci is solemn, Xin Qiji's Ci is both solemn and witty. Chen Liang's Ci poetry is based on calm thinking. The Ci poetry of Xin Qiji is biased towards direct sensation. Chen Liang is purely singing of the objects, and the allusion used is only to serve this purpose; while Xin Qiji combines singing of the objects with the history, the allusions are often the object of chanting. On the whole, the level of Xin Qiji's Ci poetry on objects is far above that of Chen Liang's.
收稿日期: 2018-11-03
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]唐圭璋. 词话丛编[Z]. 北京:中华书局, 1986.
[2]姜书阁. 陈亮龙川词笺注[M]. 北京:人民文学出版社, 1998.
[3]邓广铭. 稼轩词编年笺注[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2016.
[4]尹志腾. 清人选评词集三种[M]. 济南:齐鲁书社, 1988:205.
[5]路成文. 咏物词史上的别调——论稼轩咏物词[J]. 厦门教育学院学报, 2004(4):25-28.
[6]路成文. 宋代咏物词史论[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2005:166-167.
[7]叶嘉莹. 唐宋词名家论稿[M]. 石家庄:河北教育出版社, 1997:314.
[8]陈廷焯. 白雨斋词话[M]. 杜维沫, 校点. 北京:人民文学出版社, 2005:79.