检索
在线阅读 --河北开放大学学报 2018年2期《盗伐林木犯罪的界定与治理》
盗伐林木犯罪的界定与治理
童云峰
华东政法大学 法律学院, 上海 200042
起止页码: 54--59页
DOI: 10.13559/j.cnki.hbgd.2018.02.012
摘要:
盗伐、滥伐林木等肆意毁坏森林资源的犯罪行为导致森林覆盖率日趋减少,保护森林资源已经迫在眉睫。有必要厘清以盗伐林木罪为主的侵害森林资源的犯罪行为,要明确盗伐林木罪与盗窃罪之间的关系,明晰盗伐枯死林木的行为属性,廓清严重盗伐林木行为的定性障碍。要遏制侵害森林资源犯罪的"非法市场",完善对侵害森林资源犯罪的法律认定,拓宽治理侵害森林资源犯罪路径,动员多方主动广泛参与,完善非刑罚治理机制,实现治理方式多元化。

The Definition and Treatment of Crime of Illegal Logging
TONG Yun-feng
Law School, East China University of Politics and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
Abstract:
The criminal acts of vandalism,deforestation,and other deliberate destruction of forest resources have led to an ever-decreasing forest coverage rate and the protection of forest resources has become imminent.It is necessary to clarify the crimes of infringement on forest resources that are mainly crimes of illegal logging,clarify the relationship between crimes of illegal logging and theft,and clarify the behavioral attributes of illegal logging,to clarify the "market value" of incrimination standards of illegal purchase of illegal logging against crimes of infringement on forest resources,to improve the legal recognition of crimes of infringement on forest resources and to broaden the path of treatment against forestry crimes,to mobilize the participation of forest residents,and to improve the ecological compensation mechanism,thus to achieve diversification of governance.

收稿日期: 2018-02-08
基金项目: 国家社会科学基金项目《农用地休养生态补偿法律问题研究》(15BFX153)

参考文献:
[1]张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:1001-1002.
[2]董玉庭.主观超过因素新论[J].法学研究,2005(3):62.
[3]董玉庭.盗伐林木相关犯罪的司法认定研究[J].人民检察,2008(16):40-41.
[4]刘宪权,主编.刑法学(上)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012:246.
[5]张明楷.刑法的私塾[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014:226.
[6]刘宪权,主编.刑法学(下)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012:706.
[7]真少萍,吴孔宝.关于枯死木是否纳入盗伐滥伐犯罪对象的问题探讨[J].林业经济问题,2004(1):63.
[8]晋海,赵思静.盗伐林木罪实证研究[J].江苏警官学院学报,2016(4):56.
[9]张明楷.盗伐林木罪与盗窃罪关系[J].人民检察,2009(3):12.