有效辩护视角下辩护全覆盖制度的完善
史磊1, 杜亚欣2
1. 河北司法警官职业学院 法律系, 河北 石家庄 050081;
2. 河北省新乐市人民法院, 河北 石家庄 050799
起止页码: 51--56页
DOI:
摘要：
有效辩护和刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖制度在人权保障、充分发挥律师辩护作用和追求诉讼公正方面存在共同目标。刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖制度面临供需矛盾突出，“老三难”与“新三难”问题，值班律师制度的困境等障碍。其中既有刑事诉讼法律、法规不健全，经费投入不充足的原因，又有控辩失衡等原因。通过对有效辩护的追本溯源，明确有效辩护的要求，提出增加律师资源供给，保障辩护权利，完善值班律师制度等举措，以期解决深化推进全覆盖制度过程中的问题。
Perfection of Full Coverage System of Defense from the Perspective of Effective Defense
SHI Lei1, DU Yaxin2
1. Law Department, Hebei Vocational College of Judicial Police, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050081;
2. People's Court of Xinle City, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050799, China
Abstract:
Effective defense refers to the fact that every criminal suspect and defendant enjoys full defense rights at all stages of criminal proceedings. Defenders should perform their duties in defense and ensure that their defense brings about positive results. Effective defense and the full coverage system of lawyer defense in criminal cases share common goals in terms of human rights protection, giving full play to the role of lawyer defense, and pursuing litigation justice. The full coverage system of criminal case lawyer defense is confronted with obstacles such as the prominent contradiction between supply and demand, the “old three difficulties” and the “new three difficulties”, and the predicament of the duty lawyer system. Among them, there are reasons such as the incomplete criminal procedure laws and regulations and insufficient financial input, as well as the imbalance between the prosecution and the defense. By tracing back to the origin of effective defense, clarifying the requirements of effective defense, it proposes some measures such as increasing the supply of lawyer resources, safeguarding defense rights, and improving the duty lawyer system, in order to solve the problems in the process of deepening and promoting the full coverage system.
收稿日期: 2025-5-17
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]吴羽. 比较法视域中的公设辩护人制度研究——兼论我国公设辩护人制度的建构[J]. 东方法学， 2014（1）： 137-146.
[2]陈光中，张益南. 推进刑事辩护法律援助全覆盖问题之探讨[J]. 法学杂志， 2018（3）： 1-16.
[3]陈瑞华. 有效辩护问题的再思考[J]. 当代法学， 2017（6）： 3-13.
[4]李国华. 律师辩护全覆盖：规范分析与实效检验[J]. 人权法学， 2024（2）： 132-150.
[5]吴雨豪. 指定辩护范围扩张之实效性考察——基于试点城市抢劫罪的实证研究[J]. 法学家， 2023（1）： 130-145.
[6]欧阳庆芳，黄旭. 刑事辩护法律援助全覆盖的困境与出路——以湖北省宜昌市为例[J]. 三峡大学学报（人文社会科学版）， 2019（6）： 84-87.
[7][9] 闵春雷. 认罪认罚案件中的有效辩护[J]. 当代法学， 2017（4）： 27-37.
[8]宋英辉. 刑事诉讼原理[M]. 北京：北京大学出版社， 2014.
[9][11] 左为民. 有效辩护还是有效果辩护？ [J]. 法学评论， 2019（1）： 86-94.
[10]史磊. 刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖制度研究[D]. 石家庄：河北师范大学， 2020.
[11]刘晓晨. 刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖制度研究[D]. 沈阳：沈阳师范大学， 2022.
[12]王敏远，胡铭，陶加培. 我国近年来刑事辩护制度实施报告[J]. 法律适用， 2022（1）： 37-50.
[13]韩旭. 刑事法律援助案件之有效辩护问题探究[J]. 法商研究， 2024（4）： 120-135.