比较法视野下司法人工智能的多元演进
陈柏志
华东政法大学 法律学院, 上海 200042
起止页码: 83--85页
DOI:
摘要：
法律发达国家基于本国司法实际情况与功能定位发展出司法人工智能的不同样态。英国、美国、法国的司法人工智能，分别出于解决传统司法运行缓慢花费高昂问题、拓宽人工智能法律应用场景、加强司法数据公开等原因，推出了在线法院、量刑建议与预测正义等典型做法，但均受到各自司法制度的掣肘。人工智能在司法领域的引入非但不会改变一国司法的基本特征，反而会基于一国之司法背景，服务于司法运作，不断强化这一特征。我国司法人工智能建设应当发挥顶层设计的整合效应、试点—推广的改革逻辑和人民法院的政治定位等司法体制优势，在人工智能技术引入的基础上同时做到司法制度的因应变化。
Multi-evolution of Judicial Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Comparative Law
CHEN Baizhi
School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
Abstract:
Legal developed countries have developed different forms of judicial artificial intelligence based on their actual judicial situation and functional orientation. Judicial artificial intelligence in Britain, the United States and France has introduced typical practices such as online court, sentencing suggestion and predictive justice for solving the problem of slow and expensive traditional judicial operation, broadening the legal application scenarios of artificial intelligence and strengthening the disclosure of judicial data, but they are all constrained by their respective judicial systems. The introduction of artificial intelligence in the judicial field will not change the basic characteristics of a country’s justice, but will serve the judicial operation based on a country’s judicial background and continuously strengthen this characteristic. The construction of judicial artificial intelligence in China should give full play to the advantages of judicial system, such as the integration effect of top-level design, the reform logic of pilot-popularization and the political orientation of people’s courts, and at the same time make the judicial system adapt to changes on the basis of the introduction of artificial intelligence technology.
收稿日期: 2024-3-30
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]刘敏.电子诉讼潮流与我国民事诉讼法的应对[J].当代法学,2016(5):14-22.
[2]何勤华.外国法制史:第六版[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:182.
[3]Bruce G. Buchanan&Thomas E. Headrick, Some Speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning[J].Stanford Law Review, 1970,23(1):40-62.
[4]左卫民.关于法律人工智能在中国运用前景的若干思考[J].清华法学,2018(2):108-124.
[5]戎静."预测正义"能否预测正义?基于法国司法大数据预测应用的考察与启示[J].中外法学,2023(5):1184-1202.
[6]杨帆.比较法视野下庭审公开的制度功能[J].中外法学,2023(3):668-686.
[7]K·茨威格特,H·克茨.比较法总论:上[M].潘汉典,等,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2017.
[8]王禄生.司法大数据应用的法理冲突与价值平衡--从法国司法大数据禁令展开[J].比较法研究,2020(2):133-146.
[9]尼可拉斯·鲁曼.社会中的法[M].李君韬,译.台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2019.
[10]钱大军.司法人工智能的中国进程:功能替代与结构强化[J].法学评论,2018(5):138-152.
[11]左卫民.热与冷:中国法律人工智能的再思考[J].环球法律评论,2019(2):53-64.
[12]季卫东.人工智能时代的司法权之变[J].东方法学,2018(1):125-133.