国际私法中的普遍主义与特殊主义辩证法
张榆青, 皋珩轩
中国矿业大学[北京] 文法学院, 北京 100083
起止页码: 65--70页
DOI:
摘要：
从国际私法的理念出发，不难梳理出一组从普遍主义出发，到特殊主义的反复，再向普遍主义复归的过程。而在人类历史的发展过程中，国际私法的发展历史也一直印证着这一辩证的发展过程。经过探寻法的理念推理和历史时代两方面角度，国际私法普遍主义与特殊主义矛盾运动的辩证过程自然显现，在其中，现代普遍主义学说仍然呼唤着普遍主义的实质复归。
Dialectics of Universalism and Particularism in Private International Law
ZHANG Yuqing, GAO Hengxuan
School of Law and Humanity, China University of Mining and Technology[Beijing], Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:
Starting from the concept of private international law, it is not difficult to sort out a group of processes from universalism to particularism, and then to universalism. In the development process of human history, the development history of private international law has always confirmed this dialectical development process. The dialectical process of the contradiction movement between universalism and particularism in private international law naturally emerges through the exploration of the theory of law and the historical era, in which modern universalism still calls for the substantial return of universalism.
收稿日期: 2024-6-17
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]刘史丹.论萨维尼历史法学中的普遍性维度[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2011.
[2]黄希韦.巴托鲁斯冲突法思想考量[D].北京:中国政法大学,2009.
[3]付智星.论国际政治对国际私法的影响[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2018.
[4][5] 阎愚.冲突法历史发展中的特殊主义与普遍主义[J].政法论坛,2016(6):166-172.
[5]李双元,欧福永.国际私法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2022:45.
[6][8] 曹天予,曹南燕,范岱年.科学和哲学中的后现代性[J].哲学研究,2000(2):11-19.