认罪认罚从宽语境下逮捕功能的错位与复归
林耿新
西南政法大学 法学院, 重庆 401120
起止页码: 72--74页
DOI:
摘要：
在认罪认罚从宽制度常态化适用的背景下，逮捕功能定性出现错位，导致实践中出现“强制措施从宽”理论谬论、逮捕“筹码”化、认罪认罚非自愿非真实化等现象。逮捕功能错位滥觞于固有的逮捕观、逮捕制度上的立法不足以及认罪认罚从宽制度下特殊的检察机制等因素。据此，须从逮捕制度的“拨正”以及认罪认罚从宽制度的“松绑”两方面着手，探求可行的规范路径。
Dislocation and Restoration of Arrest Function in the Context of Leniency of Guilty Plea
LIN Gengxin
Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China
Abstract:
In the context of the normal application of the leniency system of guilty plea, the qualitative misplacement of arrest function has led to the fallacy of the theory of “leniency of coercive measures”, the “bargaining chip” of arrest, and the phenomenon of involuntary non-reality of guilty plea in practice. The misplacement of arrest function is due to the inherent view of arrest tools, the lack of legislation on arrest system and the special procuratorial examination mechanism under the lenient system of guilty plea. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the feasible normative path from the two aspects of the “correction” of the arrest system and the “release” of the lenient system of guilty plea.
收稿日期: 2024-1-2
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]杨立新.认罪认罚从宽制度理解与适用[J].国家检察官学院学报,2019(1):51-63.
[2]陈卫东.认罪认罚从宽制度与企业合规改革视角下逮捕筹码化的警惕与防范[J].政法论坛,2022(6):81-93.
[3]闫召华.虚假的忏悔:技术性认罪认罚的隐忧及其应对[J].法制与社会发展,2020(3):93-109.
[4]孙长永.认罪认罚从宽制度实施中的五个矛盾及其化解[J].政治与法律,2021(1):2-20.
[5]董林涛.我国逮捕制度之目的回归与制度重构[J].政法论坛,2015(6):164-173.
[6]吴祥义,王宏平.附条件逮捕制度的异化[J].中国检察官,2011(19):59-61.
[7]唐希.逮捕的社会危险性条件之评估机制的构建[J].江西警察学院学报,2016(6):106-111.