儿童的主体地位差异分析——以《儿童权利公约》原则在《未成年人保护法》中的适用为视角
马丽娅
浙江理工大学 法政学院, 浙江杭州 310000
起止页码: 51--53页
DOI:
摘要：
《儿童权利公约》作为国际人权条约体系的重要组成部分，明确了儿童这一独特群体的权利主体地位，我国自加入《公约》之后，将《公约》“国内法化”为以《未成年人保护法》为主的一系列未成年人保护法律。然而我国在《未成年人保护法》中体现的儿童主体地位与《公约》之间却存在着一定的差距，儿童更多地成为被保护的对象，而非权利主体。通过对《公约》原则的适用分析差异存在的原因，才能更好地改善并缩小和《公约》的差距，保护儿童的权利主体地位。
Differential Analysis of Children’s Subjective Status——From the Perspective of the Application of the Principles of The Convention on the Rights of the Child in The Law on the Protection of Minors
MA Liya
School of Law and Politics, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
Abstract:
As an important part of the human rights treaty system, The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines the status of the rights of children. Since China joined The Convention, The Convention has been “transformed into domestic law” into a series of minor protection laws, mainly The Law on the Protection of Minors. However, there is a gap between the status of children embodied in The Law on the Protection of Minors and The Convention, Children have become more protected objects than subjects of rights. By analyzing the reasons for the differences in the application of the principles of The Convention, we can better improve and narrow the gap with The Convention and protect children’s rights.
收稿日期: 2023-11-08
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]王勇民.儿童权利保护的国际法研究[D].上海:华东政法大学,2011.
[2]王雪梅.儿童权利保护的"最大利益原则"研究(下)[J].环球法律评论,2003(1):108-119.
[3]魏惠斌.最大利益原则与我国儿童权利保护[J].福建政法管理干部学院学报,2008(4):72-75.
[4]周汉平.中外儿童权利保护法之比较——基于《未成年人保护法》与《儿童权利公约》的研究[J].学理论,2019(12):95-97.
[5]王雪梅.从《儿童权利公约》的视角看中国儿童保护立法[J].当代青年研究,2007(10):6-13.
[6]王雪梅.儿童权利保护的基本原则评析[J].中国妇运,2007(6):13-21.
[7]康树华.《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》的制定历程及其特点[J].中外法学,1992(2):23-27.
[8]张杨.西方儿童权利保护论与解放论之争议与调和[J].青少年犯罪问题,2014(1):58-64.
[9]刘涛,石华琛.中国儿童权利研究的逻辑紊乱及其调适——基于学术史的考察[J].人权研究(辑刊),2021(2):236-268+526.