我国反垄断法安全港规则的法律适用研究
赵雨薇
海南大学 法学院, 海南海口 570208
起止页码: 48--50页
DOI:
摘要：
反垄断法安全港规则在我国正式入法后还没有一例具体适用的案例。为解决我国反垄断法安全港规则无法适用的问题，我国安全港规则应排除“核心限制”，将其适用范围限缩在纵向非价格垄断协议之内、明确市场份额标准的具体内容、划分“安全港”条款与特殊豁免条款的适用范围以及对兜底条款中的典型协议进行列举，从而有效解决“安全港”在我国反垄断执法中无法适用的问题。
Research on the Legal Application of the Safe Harbor Rules of China’s Antitrust Law
ZHAO Yuwei
School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570208, China
Abstract:
There has not been a specific case of application of the safe harbor rule in the antitrust law after it officially entered into the law in China. In order to solve the problem that the safe harbor rules of China’s antitrust law cannot be applied, China’s safe harbor rule should exclude the “core restriction”, limit its application scope to the vertical non-price monopoly agreement, clarify the specific content of the market share standard, divide the application scope of the “safe harbor” clauses and the special exemption clauses, and list the typical agreements in the backstop clause, so as to effectively solve the problem that “safe harbor” not be applied in China’s antitrust law enforcement.
收稿日期: 2023-10-27
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]马栋.我国反垄断法安全港规则产生的新问题与完善方向[J].竞争政策研究,2023(3):49-59.
[2]余东华,乔岳,张伟.横向并购反垄断规制中的安全港规则研究[J].产业经济研究,2010(3):70-76.
[3]许光耀.转售价格维持案件中垄断行为的识别——兼评新《反垄断法》第18条[J].法学评论,2023(3):68-79.
[4]焦海涛.纵向非价格垄断协议的反垄断法规制:困境与出路[J].现代法学,2019(4):123-139.
[5][6] 刘继峰.我国反垄断法纵向垄断协议安全港制度的完善[J].中州学刊,2023(2):64-72.