对历史发展动力问题的探究
孙源苹
辽宁大学 哲学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110136
起止页码: 105--108页
DOI:
摘要：
对历史发展动力的研究是哲学家亘古不变的课题，古代的哲学家普遍关注神和自然，大多忽视了人的价值和作用；近代以来的哲学家，都突出强调了人的地位和作用，康德还尤其重视人的理性，他们普遍认为“恶”是历史发展的动力，是人的邪恶欲望推动了历史的前进；马克思和恩格斯是对近代哲学家观点的总结和升华，他们指出生产力是社会发展的根本动力，并提出历史合力论这一观点，是对历史发展动力问题的一个比较完备的回答；西方马克思主义者结合时代背景，形成了人本主义和科学主义两大流派来解释历史发展的动力问题。
Exploration on the Issue of the Driving Force of Historical Development
SUN Yuanping
Philosophy School, Liaoning University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110136, China
Abstract:
The study of the driving force of historical development has always been the subject of philosophers. Ancient philosophers generally paid attention to God and nature, but mostly ignored the value and role of human beings. Since modern times, philosophers emphasized the status and role of human beings. Kant especially attached importance to human rationality. They generally believe that "evil" is the driving force of historical development, that it is the evil desire of human beings to promote the progress of history. Marx and Engels summarized and sublimated the views of modern philosophers.They pointed out that productive forces are the fundamental driving force of social development, and put forward the view of historical synergy theory, which is a relatively complete answer to the issue of historical development driving force. Western Marxists combined with the background of the times and formed two schools of humanism and scientism to explain the motive force of historical development.
收稿日期: 2023-10-22
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]罗素.西方哲学史(上卷)[M].何兆武,李约瑟,译.北京:商务印书馆,2008:72.
[2]维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:人民文学出版社,1997:85.
[3]托马斯·霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复,黎廷弼,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014:72.
[4]康德.历史理性批判文集[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,1990.
[5]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972:244.