论数字政府视角下自动化执法的行政法规制
刘翼峰, 赵凯
东北大学 文法学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110169
起止页码: 57--60页
DOI:
摘要：
在数字政府建设的历程中，自动化执法主要经历了四个阶段：静态阶段、互动阶段、成熟阶段和裁量阶段，就目前而言，自动化执法属于具体行政行为的范畴。自动化执法包含技术和法治两个要素，但技术不会因为法律文本的限制而停滞不前，技术的进步带来了行政执法形态和方式的变革，却也带来了程序的僭越、实体的失衡、权利救济不足等问题。因此，需要在行政法的框架下对自动化执法进行调适，严格贯彻正当程序原则，在实体上力求平衡，完善权利救济规范。
On the Administrative Regulation System of Automated Law Enforcement from the Perspective of Digital Government
LIU Yi-feng, ZHAO Kai
School of Humanities and Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110169, China
Abstract:
In the course of digital government construction, automated law enforcement has mainly experienced four stages:static stage, interactive stage, mature stage and discretionary stage. At present, automated law enforcement belongs to the category of specific administrative acts. Automated law enforcement includes two elements:technology and rule of law, but technology will not stop because of the limitation of legal texts. The progress of technology has also brought about changes in the forms and methods of administrative law enforcement, but it has also brought about problems such as the arrogation of procedures, the imbalance of entities, and the insufficiency of rights relief. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the automatic law enforcement under the framework of administrative law, strictly implement the principle of due process, strive for balance in the entity, and improve the standard of rights relief.
收稿日期: 2023-08-18
基金项目: 沈阳市法学会沈阳市社科联2023年度一般课题“完善沈阳市市场主体的信用监管机制研究”（SYFX2023020）
参考文献：
[1]冉克平.论公物的概念、权利属性及其适用[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5):98-102.
[2]秦梅玉.自动化行政的兴起及其法律挑战[J].社会科学动态,2021(2):5-12.
[3]马颜昕.自动化行政的分级与法律控制变革[J].行政法学研究,2019(1):80-92.
[4]高文英.警务数据的应用与执法方式改革探究——以贵州、四川泸州警务数据的应用为例[J].警学研究,2019(1):5-13.
[5]张可.大数据侦查之程序控制:从行政逻辑迈向司法逻辑[J].中国刑事法杂志,2019(2):131-144.
[6]查云飞.大数据检查的行政法构造[J].华东政法大学学报,2022(1):50-63.
[7]马颜昕.自动化行政方式下的行政处罚:挑战与回应[J].政治与法律,2020(4):139-148.
[8]敖双红,雷金晶.论自动化行政及其法律规制[J].湖南警察学院学报,2017(1):84-90.