刑事司法中行政证据转化问题研究
申纪元
中国人民公安大学 研究生院, 北京 100032
起止页码: 50--52页
DOI:
摘要：
2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改，明确了行政证据向刑事证据转化的资格，但此后相继公布的解释类规范性文件并未使得证据转化趋于明确，反而产生了一系列问题。解决眼下实践问题的现实方式并非立法论研究，而是应当以解释论的视角回应争议。基于解释论的研究方法，可转化的证据收集主体包括行政机关和行政授权组织，可转化的证据种类应采最广义说，待转化行政证据的审查判断应当采用行政证据标准，公安机关收集的言辞证据不必重新收集，立案前后收集的证据并非证据转化条款规制的范围。
Research on the Transformation of Administrative Evidence in Criminal Justice
SHEN Ji-yuan
Graduate School of People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100032, China
Abstract:
In 2012, the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law clarified the qualification of the transformation of administrative evidence into criminal evidence, but the normative documents of interpretation published successively did not make the transformation of evidence more clear, yet produced a series of problems. The practical way to solve the current practical problems is not to study the legislation theory, yet to respond to the disputes from the perspective of interpretative theory. Based on the research method of interpretive theory, the subject of transferable evidence collection includes administrative organs and administrative authorized organizations, the types of transferable evidence should be in the broadest sense, and the examination and judgment of administrative evidence to be transformed should be based on administrative evidence standards. The verbal evidence collected by public security organs should not be re-collected, and the evidence collected before and after filing a case is not within the scope of the regulation of evidence transformation provisions.
收稿日期: 2023-06-25
基金项目:
参考文献：
[1]李煜兴. 行刑衔接的规范阐释及其机制展开——以新《行政处罚法》行刑衔接条款为中心[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(4):64-78.
[2]孙伟. 论行政执法证据在刑事诉讼中的使用[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2017:11-13.
[3]倪利. 两法衔接下的行政执法证据准入问题新论[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2022(4):110-116.